Faculty authoring
Faculty can upload course material, define learning objectives, shape AI behavior, create assessments, and build Case-Based Learning experiences without custom software work.
PRISM helps institutions turn course materials and faculty intent into interactive guided learning, case-based experiences, assessments, and course-grounded learner support.
PRISM was built first for medical education and clinical reasoning. Its authoring, grounding, and delivery model is designed to support other fields where educators need structured learning around trusted source material.
Faculty can upload course material, define learning objectives, shape AI behavior, create assessments, and build Case-Based Learning experiences without custom software work.
Educator-designed activities guide learners through information, questions, and feedback in deliberate stages rather than relying on static content or open-ended chat.
Learner-facing support stays grounded in faculty material and course boundaries, and can be deployed across courses, classrooms, programs, and partner-led educational settings.
The platform is designed to follow the way rigorous education works: expert authorship first, course grounding next, and controlled delivery into real learning settings.
Faculty and institutions can upload their own material, define objectives, and create AI teaching tools shaped by the curriculum they already teach.
Documents, faculty guidance, and program boundaries stay close to the experience so learners engage with course-specific expectations rather than generic responses.
PRISM can be used across courses, classrooms, training programs, specialty-society education, and continuing-education models where operational fit matters alongside pedagogy.
PRISM uses AI to extend faculty-designed teaching, not to set the curriculum. Faculty choose the source material, define the learning objectives and teaching points, and control what is published. PRISM uses that structure to deliver interactive cases, course-grounded study support, and assessments at scale.
The goal is not to automate teaching. It is to make thoughtful, faculty-directed teaching available more consistently and at greater scale.
Instructors select the lectures, guidelines, cases, and other references that define the course context.
Instructors set objectives, questions, feedback criteria, and the sequence through which learners progress.
AI may assist with drafting, but published guided cases pass through faculty review and approval before learner use.
During an activity, AI responds to the learner within the structure, guidance, and source context established for that course.
PRISM’s clinical roots remain its primary proof point for structured reasoning, faculty-authored cases, and course-grounded learner support.
For faculty teams exploring guided learning around their own sources, objectives, standards, and forms of expert reasoning.
For organizations that need interactive, controlled professional-learning experiences with stronger engagement options than static content alone.
PRISM’s staged learning model grew from Case-Based Learning in medicine: learners work through information, questions, and feedback in a deliberate sequence. The same structure is designed to support guided readings, interactive lectures, professional scenarios, and other forms of expert-led learning.
PRISM helps educators move learners through staged cases, scenarios, readings, or problems that require interpretation and judgment, not just information retrieval.
Case-based Learning in Medical Education - McGraw-Hill Red Paper